Skip to content
Hard question November 19, 2012 · 5:09 · 12 min

Hosts rebut Proof 25 and defend creation

The hosts argue the proof is poorly constructed: its logic does not follow, 'abiogenesis' names a field of study rather than a solved answer, and lab synthesis still involves a creator doing the mixing. They affirm a six-day creation stance from Genesis, God's breathing the soul into Adam, science as explaining how God did things, and warn Christians to actually study the topic before speaking on it ('don't be this man on God's team').

More on Apologetics

Now playing
0:00 0:00