What's happening: the Coppertone Facebook ban

• Is there any nudity — art, photography, statues, etc. — that can be considered nonsexual?

Dan poses the first news question: a mother was banned from Facebook for posting a photo of her toddler recreating the 1953 Coppertone-girl pose. He asks whether any nudity — art, photography, statues — can be considered nonsexual, with options A (nothing sexual about children or art), B (can't be too careful), C (you said buttocks). Two hosts land on B, arguing private parts should stay off social media and you should control what you can; a third resists restricting everything for the sake of the worst pervert, settling on a 'Holy Spirit distinction': believers have a responsibility not to promote impropriety, without chasing every possible misuse.