Skip to content
Hard question April 15, 2024 · 10:43 · 3 min

One-to-ten appropriateness vote and the planning bafflement

  • On a scale of 1 to 10, how appropriate is a shirtless sword swallower climbing a pole as entertainment at a men's conference?
  • Was Driscoll right to call out the act publicly, or should he have gone to the pastor privately first per Matthew 18?

Ben poses the question: level of appropriateness, one to ten, of a shirtless sword swallower climbing a pole at a men's conference. Boova rates it a zero, Ben a two, Dan a solid zero. The hosts are baffled by the planning chain: a committee hired him, someone installed the pole, and dozens of planners at an enormous event never vetoed it. Dan suggests Driscoll could have countered the Matthew 18 invocation with First Timothy 5: publicly rebuke those who sin so the rest will be afraid.

More on Discernment

Now playing
0:00 0:00